Evidence Hub

A systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential treatment strategies for osteoporosis

Nayak S, Greenspan SL

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of sequential osteoporosis treatment strategies. Sequential strategies resulting in the greatest BMD gain included romosozumab to denosumab or bisphosphonates; teriparatide to romosozumab or denosumab; and bisphosphonates to romosozumab. These findings can help guide sequential medication choice for patients with osteoporosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of sequential osteoporosis medication strategies on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture outcomes.

METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and pre-specified criteria were applied to select relevant primary studies for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Thirty-nine primary studies were included. Meta-analysis summary estimates for BMD change on the second medication in a treatment sequence showed robust BMD gain with bisphosphonates followed by 1 year of romosozumab at the lumbar spine (10.1%, 95% CI 9.9-10.4), femoral neck (3.1%, 95% CI 2.9-3.4), and total hip (3.1%, 95% CI 2.7-3.5). Moderate BMD gains were found with romosozumab followed by 1 year of denosumab, with summary estimates of 4.0% (95% CI 1.2-6.7) at the lumbar spine, 2.2% (95% CI 0.5-3.8) at the femoral neck, and 2.8% (95% CI 0.8-4.9) at the total hip; similar gains were found with teriparatide transitioned to 1 year of denosumab. Bisphosphonates followed by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free