Evidence Hub

Incomplete Evidence of Bone Density Normalization Following Long-Term Reproductive Hormone Treatment in Men With Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism

de Silva NL, Hyams E, Grant B, Dixit P, Bassi R, Bassett P, Comninos AN, Jayasena CN

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025

625 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: The prevalence and severity of low bone mineral density (BMD) in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH), as well as the ability of reproductive hormone treatment to normalize BMD have not been investigated in large multicenter studies.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of several small, observational studies to investigate the effect of reproductive hormone treatment on BMD in men with HH compared with control groups where available.

METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting BMD or fractures in men with HH (congenital [CHH] or acquired). Study selection and data extraction were performed using COVIDENCE and a prespecified tool. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Meta-analysis compared BMD in men with HH vs healthy controls. Meta-regression assessed relationships between treatment duration and BMD Z-scores against normative population data.

RESULTS: Of the 33 eligible studies, 24 included data specific to men with HH (n = 625). Men with HH had low lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck BMD, improving with hormonal treatment. Meta-analysis of 5 studies found lower LS BMD in men with HH vs healthy controls (SMD -5.98; 95% CI; -11.5 to -0.47). Men with CHH may have persistently low BMD despite prolonged hormonal treatment. Higher BMD in HH was associated with younger age at treatment initiation, partial HH, and higher serum testosterone and estradiol…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 625 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free