Evidence Hub

Association of IL-6 G-174C polymorphism with bone mineral density

Ni Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Pan Y, Ma J, Wang L

Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2014

11,499 participants

Abstract

Functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of interleukin-6 (IL-6) are known to be involved in bone mineral density (BMD) and the development of osteoporosis, but the reported results have been inconsistent. Using the meta-analysis approach, the present study is designed to provide a relatively comprehensive picture of the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis and polymorphisms in the promoter region of IL-6 (rs1800795 and rs1800796). The difference of bone mineral density (BMD) values between genotypes was examined by mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Association between IL-6 polymorphism and clinical osteoporosis was evaluated by pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % CIs. A total of 13 articles with 11,499 subjects were included in the present study. For -174 (rs1800795), we found that individuals with the G/G genotype had a significantly lower BMD value than those with C/C genotype at femoral neck (0.02 g/cm(2), 95 % CI 0.00-0.03) (p = 0.04) and distal radius (0.01 g/cm(2), 95 %CI 0.01-0.01) (p < 0.0001). However, we did not find a statistically significant difference of BMD at the spine. When analysis was limited to postmenopausal women, similar results were obtained. We further found that the C/C genotype was associated with a reduced risk of osteoporosis compared to G/G genotype, and the pooled OR was 0.72 (95 % CI 0.54-0.95, p = 0.02). In addition, a significant relationship was found between G-634C (rs1800796)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 11,499 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free