Monitoring osteoporosis treatment
Abstract
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are recommended in some guidelines for monitoring osteoporosis treatment. However, evidence to support this approach is lacking, since treatment-induced changes in bone density may take up to 3 years to detect and do not predict fracture reduction. Biochemical markers of bone turnover have potential for monitoring since they change rapidly in response to treatment and are more predictive of fracture reduction, but variability of their measurement reduces their value in clinical practice. Neither approach has been shown to improve adherence to therapy. By contrast, there is evidence that discussion with a health-care professional improves treatment adherence, regardless of feedback about monitoring tests. At present, there is no justification for the use of bone-density measurement or bone-turnover markers in routine monitoring, but patients should be fully informed about their treatment and provided with the opportunity to discuss treatment-related issues with a health-care professional.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone density in vitamin D-deficient children and adolescents: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Calcium supplementation during pregnancy and maternal and offspring bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Change in CT-measured acetabular bone density following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta
- Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta
- Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.