Evidence Hub

Phase IV Study on New Insights in Remodeling of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Gender Difference in Intramyocardial, Molecular and Neuroendocrine Assessment in Response to Chronic Inhibition of Cyclic GMP Phosphodiesterase 5A

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2019

120 participants

Abstract

Pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is yet unclear and gender differences at baseline and a specific treatment have not been indicated. The investigators already demonstrated the positive impact of phosphodiesterase type 5A (PDE5A) inhibition in men. The investigators' study aims to characterize DCM, measuring molecular and neuroendocrine assessment to relate to intramyocardial metabolism and cardiac kinetic. The investigators will perform a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study enrolling 164 diabetic patients (females and males) with DCM, to evaluate gender responses to 6 months of PDE5A inhibitors (PDE5Ai). The investigators' study will describe gender differences in DCM features. The proposed research will test whether PDE5Ai could become a new target for antiremodeling drugs and to discover a molecular pathways affected by this class of drugs and a network of circulating markers for the early diagnosis, monitoring and prediction of response to treatment of DCM.

Conditions: Diabetic Cardiomyopathy, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2.

Primary outcome: Change from Baseline in Left Ventricular torsion (°) at 5 months.

Enrollment: 120 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free