Evidence Hub

Clinical efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil in Eisenmenger syndrome--a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study

Saibal Mukhopadhyay, Srikanth Nathani, Jamal Yusuf, Devendra Shrimal, Sanjay Tyagi

Congenital Heart Disease, 2011

105 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In a randomized double-blind crossover trial, we compared the efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor tadalafil with placebo in patients of Eisenmenger Syndrome (ES). The primary end point was the change in 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD). Secondary end points were the effect of the drug on systemic oxygen saturation (SO(2) ), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), effective pulmonary blood flow (EPBF), and World Health Organization (WHO) functional class. BACKGROUND: ES is a disorder with limited treatment options. Uncontrolled studies have shown PDE-5 inhibitors to be beneficial in patients of ES. METHODS: Twenty-eight symptomatic adult patients of ES with weight ≥30 kg in WHO class II and III were enrolled. Patients were given 40 mg of tadalafil or matching placebo for 6 weeks followed by crossover to the other drug after a washout period of 2 weeks. Assessment of WHO class, exercise capacity by 6 MWD, and various hemodynamic parameters by cardiac catheterization was done at baseline, after 6 weeks and at the end of the study. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. There was significant increase in 6 MWD following drug administration compared with baseline (404.18 ± 69.54 m vs. 357.75 ± 73.25 m, P < .001). Compared with placebo, tadalafil produced significant decrease in PVR (-7.32 ± 1.58, P < .001), resulting in significant increase in EPBF (0.12 ± 0.05, P= .03), SO(2) % (1.72 ± 0.58, P= .007), and WHO…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free