What is the position of pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific drug therapy in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: It is commonly reported a limitation of therapeutic strategy in Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) historically. This qualitative systematic review is conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific drug therapy (PAH-SDT) for ES patients for a clinical therapeutic strategy based on evidence.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases have been systematically reviewed up to January 2019. Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search, quality evaluation, and data extraction. The occurrence of death, deterioration, and adverse events (AEs) has respectively been described as a count or percentage. Meta-analysis was conducted by Stata 15.1, and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were recorded for continuous data. Randomized-effect model or fixed-effect model was applied according to the heterogeneity test.
Results: Fifteen citations recruiting 456 patients associated with ES were eventually pooled, which involved 4 RCTs, 6 prospective studies, and 5 retrospective studies. Within the first year, it indicated PAH-SDT significantly ameliorated exercise capacity in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (I = 60.5%; WMD: 53.86 m, 95% CI [36.59, 71.13], P < .001), functional class (FC) (WMD = -0.71, 95% CI [-0.98, -0.44], P < .001) and Borg dyspnea index (WMD = -1.28, 95% CI [-1.86, -0.70], P < .001), in addition to hemodynamics, especially mean pulmonary arterial pressure by 5.70 mmHg (WMD…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 456 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.