A randomized single-center study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil once daily plus lidocaine anesthetic spray on premature ejaculation
Abstract
Objective: The use of topical local anesthetics in the form of creams, gel or spray is the oldest method of retarding ejaculation. However, several studies have suggested that phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (5-PDEiS) show a potential therapeutic use in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil-only, tadalafil plus local anesthetic spray (lidocaine), and topical lidocaine spray-only before intercourse on the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of patients with lifelong PE.
Patients and methods: The study included 78 men in stable heterosexual, monogamous relationships (of ≥3 months) who were diagnosed with lifelong PE. The patients were divided into three groups: G1: 25 patients who received lidocaine spray 10 g/100 ml at 5 min before intercourse; G2: 27 patients who received tadalafil 5 mg once daily; G3: 26 patients who treated with tadalafil once daily plus lidocaine spray before planned sexual activity. The treatments were continued for up to three months in all groups. Moreover, the quality of their sexual attempts was rated on a 5-point scale. Follow-up was made at 1-month and 3-month.
Results: Not statistically significant differences emerged between the three groups at baseline. Mean ejaculatory latency time at the 3-month follow-up in G1, G2 and G3 was 3.7±1.3, 3.4±1.5, 5.6±1.7 (p<0.001). Mean satisfaction score was at the 3-month follow-up in G1: 2.8±1.4, in G2: 2.9±1.8,…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 78 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.