Efficacy and safety of tadalafil across ethnic groups and various risk factors in men with erectile dysfunction: Use of a novel noninferiority study design
Abstract
Aim: This U.S. multicenter open-label study used a noninferiority trial design to assess the efficacy of tadalafil 20 mg to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in the black American and Hispanic groups compared with a reference group of Caucasians. A secondary objective was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil 20 mg in various populations of men with ED.
Methods: A total of 1,911 patients with ED were enrolled into eight predefined groups: (1-3) Caucasian (Reference group), Black American, or Hispanic patients, 65 years of age, no diabetes or depression; (7) patients who met enrollment criteria but were not included in any other group; and (8) patients with ED due to traumatic spinal cord injury. The study had a 4-week run-in period, followed by a 12-week treatment period with tadalafil taken as needed, up to one dose/day, prior to sexual activity. Change from baseline to endpoint in the Erectile Function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used to determine noninferiority of groups 2 and 3 from group 1. Secondary efficacy measures included other IIEF domains and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP).
Results: Noninferiority analyses based on the EF domain score showed that tadalafil was as efficacious in the Hispanic and Black American groups as in the Reference group. Patients in each of the eight groups had a significant change from baseline (P < 0.001) in the IIEF EF domain score and positive responses to SEP Questions 1-5. The most…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,911 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.