Evidence Hub

Effects of social support and self-efficacy on eHealth literacy in Korean women undergoing breast cancer treatment: A secondary analysis

Bangwoo Lee, Ju-Yeon Uhm, Myoung Soo Kim

Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2023

143 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Objective Patients with breast cancer need to seek out and understand relevant health information to make informed decisions about long-term and complicated illnesses. With the increased use of interventions using online health information, research on eHealth literacy should be expanded. However, existing studies on the factors affecting eHealth literacy in patients with breast cancer are currently lacking. This study, therefore, conducts a secondary analysis of a previous study that surveyed the quality of life of patients with breast cancer. The primary study found a significant correlation between eHealth literacy, social support, and self-efficacy. In this secondary analysis study, we specifically examine eHealth literacy among patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment, and how patient demographic characteristics, breast cancer-specific self-efficacy, and social support contribute to their eHealth literacy. Methods A total of 143 women receiving outpatient treatment or were hospitalized for breast cancer at a cancer hospital in South Korea participated in the study from January to November 2022. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), Multidimensional Social Support Scale, and Breast Cancer Survivors Scale were utilized in the analysis. The data were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis. Results Full-time employment (β = 0.19, P = 0.006), a monthly family income of over 4 million won (3600 USD) (β = 0.14, P = 0.042), completing a high school education (β =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 143 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free