A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of the Efficacy, Toxicity, and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy Utilising Lutetium-177 and Actinium-225 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) presents significant challenges. In this systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression, the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) utilising lutetium-177 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) and actinium-225 ([225Ac]Ac-PSMA) were assessed.
METHODS
A detailed literature search across PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted, culminating in the inclusion of 100 studies involving 8711 patients. Data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, toxicity profiles, and QoL and survival outcomes were analysed. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS
The estimated proportion of patients with PSA decline ≥50% was 0.49 for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA and 0.60 for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA in mPCa, particularly metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A meta-regression analysis indicated an association between the cumulative amount of administered activity and the proportion of PSA ≥50% decline. Positive PSA responses were observed alongside improved overall survival across both therapies. Our analyses also identified the key factors associated with PSA responses and survival outcomes, including baseline haemoglobin level, and the presence of visceral metastases. Although anaemia was commonly observed, with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, severe toxicities were…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,711 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.