Ketamine for major depression in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
Abstract
Abstract Major depressive disorder (MDD) significantly impairs adolescents’ development, with increasing rates of treatment resistance and suicide risk. Ketamine has emerged as a promising, rapid-acting antidepressant in adults, but its efficacy and safety in adolescents remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes of ketamine administration in youth with mood disorders. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42024568658), four studies were included, comprising 272 adolescents aged 12–18 years. Three studies (n = 189) contributed data to the meta-analysis. At 24 hours post-administration, ketamine showed a small, non-significant effect on depressive symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = −0.19; 95% CI: −0.41 to 0.04). Clinical response and remission were not significantly different between groups, but ketamine was associated with a significantly higher rate of suicidal ideation remission (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08). Adverse events were generally mild, transient, and consistent with known pharmacological effects. While findings support ketamine’s potential role in acute presentations, current evidence is preliminary. Larger randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify the clinical utility, optimal protocols, and long-term safety of this approach in adolescent populations.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 272 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.