Evidence Hub

Efficacy of adjunctive periodontal interventions in non-surgical periodontal therapy for Stage III/IV Grade C periodontitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Shih-Ying Lin, Hung-Ying Lin, Jui-Sheng Sun, Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang

Japanese Dental Science Review, 2025

1,431 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of adjunctive therapies combined with non-surgical periodontal treatment for Stage III/IV Grade C periodontitis, focusing on pocket depth (PD) reduction, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and adverse events. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted, including randomized controlled trials up to September 2024. Inconsistencies and publication bias were detected, prompting sensitivity analyses and effectiveness rankings of adjunctive therapies. Data from 50 studies were included, with 45 entered into network meta-analysis, covering 24 interventions and 1431 patients. Compared to scaling and root planing (SRP) alone, adjunctive systemic lincosamides with nitroimidazole (Mac/Linc+Nitro-S) demonstrated the greatest PD reduction, followed by local statins (Statins-L) in the short term (≤3 months). Statins-L also provided the highest CAL gain. In the medium term (4–6 months), Statins-L remained the most effective, followed by bisphosphonates. For long-term (>6 months) follow-up, where fewer treatment approaches were available, Nitro-S achieved the most significant PD reduction and CAL gain, followed by Mac/Linc-S. Adverse effects were mild and self-limiting. Despite promising findings, inconsistencies in CAL outcomes and potential publication bias highlight the need for further research to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,431 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free