Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy is a standard treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the optimal monotherapy agent post-dual antiplatelet therapy remains unclear. Clopidogrel and aspirin are widely used, yet their comparative effectiveness and safety in this patient population have not been fully established. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy following PCI in patients with ACS. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to March 31, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy in adult ACS patients post-PCI were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included target-vessel and target-lesion revascularization, cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death, and stent thrombosis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and the GRADE methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Three RCTs involving 16,056 patients (clopidogrel: 8103; aspirin: 7953) were included. Clopidogrel significantly reduced MI (risk ratio = 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.92; P = 0.01) and target-vessel revascularization (risk ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.97; P = 0.03). No significant differences were found in all-cause death, ischemic stroke,…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 16,056 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.