Apalutamide and Goserelin for Androgen Receptor-Positive Salivary Gland Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial, YATAGARASU.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To assess efficacy and safety of apalutamide plus goserelin for androgen receptor (AR)-positive, unresectable or recurrent/metastatic salivary gland carcinoma (URM-SGC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II study for patients with AR-positive URM-SGC. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) by an independent central radiology review (ICRR) in the first 24 response evaluable patients who had been observed at least 24 weeks from study initiation (primary RE patients). The efficacy was to be declared when at least 8 of the 24 primary RE patients responded.
RESULTS
31 patients were enrolled. In the first 24 primary RE patients with a median follow-up of 7.4 months, confirmed ORR by ICRR was 25.0% (6/24 patients; 95%CI: 9.8%-46.7%; P =0.11 (one-sided)), which did not meet the predefined criteria of efficacy. Clinical benefit rate (ORR + rate of stable disease for at least 24 weeks) and median progression-free survival were 50.0% and 7.4 months, respectively. Both median duration of response and overall survival were not reached. Exploratory analyses showed a better ORR of 54.5% (6/11) in patients with AR-positivity ≥ 70% and no history of prior systemic therapy. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 35.5% (11/31), which included skin rash, anemia, leukopenia, and cancer pain.
CONCLUSIONS
Although this study did not meet the predefined efficacy criteria, apalutamide plus goserelin…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 31 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.