Evidence Hub

Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for treating insomnia in adults aged 65 and older: a secondary analysis using individual participant data from three randomized controlled trials

Kathryn A. Tarnai, C. Miller, N. Magill, R. Emsley, Will Robinson, S. Kyle, Emer R. McGrath, C. Espie et al.

Aging & Mental Health, 2025

315 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Insomnia prevalence increases with age. Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for insomnia is the first-line treatment, limited accessibility leaves many older adults with few effective treatment options. This study assessed the efficacy of digital CBT (dCBT) for treating insomnia, anxiety, and depression symptoms in adults aged 65 and older. Method Data from three published randomized controlled trials of dCBT for insomnia (Sleepio) versus controls were combined for those aged 65+ with insomnia disorder (N = 315). Insomnia, anxiety, and depression scores were standardized into z-scores for comparison. Mixed-effects models estimated the treatment effect on insomnia, depression, and anxiety outcomes at post-treatment (8–10 wk) and follow-up (24 wk). Chi-squared tests of Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI-8) scores evaluated post-treatment insomnia remission rates between groups. Results Compared with controls, dCBT generated significantly greater improvements at post-treatment and follow-up in insomnia (gs ≤ −1.88, ps < 0.001) and depression (gs ≤ −0.44, ps ≤ 0.001) and significantly greater improvements in anxiety at post-treatment (g = −0.33, p < 0.001). dCBT generated higher post-treatment insomnia remission rates (60% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). Conclusion dCBT can effectively improve symptoms of insomnia, anxiety, and depression in adults aged 65+. Digital CBT may serve as an accessible means for older adults to receive guideline-concordant treatment at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 315 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free