Evidence Hub

Factors Influencing Caregivers’ Use of Respite Care Services: Secondary Analysis of the National Study of Caregiving

B. Ogunjesa, Xiaotian Gao, Minakshi Raj

Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

This study examines when and why unpaid caregivers use respite services. We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2017 National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) Wave III, a U.S. nationally representative sample comprising 2652 unpaid caregivers. We found that unpaid caregivers reporting financial, physical, and emotional difficulties in caregiving were more likely to use respite care services than those not reporting these challenges. White, non-Hispanic caregivers reporting that they received support from their social networks (families/friends) were more likely to use respite care services than non-White and/or Hispanic caregivers receiving such support. Non-White and/or Hispanic caregivers who belonged to or attended support groups were more likely to use respite care support than those without social group affiliation. Respite care is underutilized in the U.S. despite its value and efficacy in supporting caregivers’ mental and physical well-being. Policies are necessary to increase availability and access to respite services for diverse unpaid caregivers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free