Final analysis of the ZOE-LTFU trial to 11 years post-vaccination: efficacy of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine against herpes zoster and related complications
Abstract
Summary Background Herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines should provide durable protection against HZ and HZ-related complications. We report the final analysis of a long-term follow-up (LTFU) study (ZOE-LTFU) including 11 years of follow-up after primary vaccination with recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). Methods ZOE-LTFU (NCT02723773) was an open-label, phase 3b study following participants of two phase 3 trials, ZOE-50 and ZOE-70. ZOE-LTFU started approximately 5 years post-vaccination in ZOE-50/70 and participants were followed for 6 years. The primary objective was to assess vaccine efficacy (VE) against HZ during ZOE-LTFU. Secondary objectives included VE against HZ from 1 month post-dose 2 in ZOE-50/70 until end of ZOE-LTFU, VE against post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) and non-PHN complications, immunogenicity, and long-term safety. The VE calculation used a historical control constructed with ZOE-50/70 placebo data. Findings VE was assessed in the modified total vaccinated cohort (n = 7273 [mean age 67·3 years at first vaccination]). During ZOE-LTFU, VE was 79·8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73·7, 84·6) and 73·2% (95% CI: 62·9, 80·9) against HZ in participants ≥50 and ≥70 years at first vaccination, respectively, and was 87·5% (95% CI: 64·8, 96·8) against PHN and 91·7% (95% CI: 43·7, 99·8) against other HZ-related complications in participants ≥50 years. From 1 month post-dose 2 in ZOE-50/70 to the end of ZOE-LTFU, VE against HZ was 87·7% (95% CI: 84·9, 90·1) in participants ≥50…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7,273 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.