Association between the systemic immune-inflammation index and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prognosis in HER2 positive breast cancer—a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background The prognosis of patients who can achieve a complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be significantly improved. Thus, accurately predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of great clinical significance. Currently, previous indicators such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was poor in predicting the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer patients. Methods The data of 172 HER2 positive breast cancer patients admitted to the Nuclear 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Province from January 2015 to January 2017 were retrospectively collected. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patients were divided into the complete response group (n=70) and the non-complete response group (n=102). The clinical characteristics and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) levels of the two groups were compared. The patients were followed-up for 5 years post-surgery to observe whether recurrence or metastasis occurred after the operation by clinic visit combined with telephone calls. Results The SII of the complete response group was significantly lower than that of the non-complete response group (587.43±175.97 vs. 821.82±231.58; P=0.000). The SII was valuable in predicting which HER2 positive breast cancer patients would fail to achieve a pathological complete response, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.773 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.705–0.804; P=0.000]. A SII >755.10 was…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 102 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.