Evidence Hub

Comparison of Virological Efficacy of DTG/ABC/3TG and B/F/TAF Regimens and Discontinuation Patterns in Persons Living with Advanced HIV in the Era of Rapid ART: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Chun-Yuan Lee, Chen-Hsiang Lee, Hung-Jen Tang, Hung-Chin Tsai, Chen-Hsun Yang, Yi-Pei Lin, Sheng-Fan Wang, Po-Liang Lu

Infectious Disease and Therapy, 2022

162 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

International treatment guidelines recommend the rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) with bictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens for treatment-naïve persons living with HIV (PLWH) irrespective of their disease stage. However, we lack evidence of the virological efficacy, virological failure, and tolerability of coformulated B/F/TAF and DTG/ABC/3TC regimens in persons living with advanced HIV (PLWAH; defined as persons with a CD4+ count of < 200 cells/μL or an AIDS-related opportunistic illness [AOI] at or before ART initiation) in the era of rapid ART. This retrospective multicenter study enrolled treatment-naïve PLWAH initiating ART with coformulated DTG/ABC/3TC or B/F/TAF in 2019–2020. Viral suppression at week 48 was analyzed using FDA snapshot analysis. Between-regimen differences in time to viral suppression (< 50 copies/mL), virological failure, and regimen discontinuation were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Analysis was also performed using time to regimen discontinuation due to adverse reactions (ARs) as the outcome. We enrolled 162 patients, including 61.1% on DTG/ABC/3TC and 38.9% on B/F/TAF. At week 48 after ART initiation, 73.47% on DTG/ABC/3TC and 85.71% on B/F/TAF achieved viral suppression (P = 0.178). We identified no between-regimen differences in time to viral suppression or virological failure, regardless of pre-ART viral load. Compared with the DTG/ABC/3TC group,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 162 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free