Clinical efficacy and nephrotoxicity of intravenous colistin sulfate in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are becoming increasingly important bacterial pathogens in critically ill patients. Several clinicians use Intravenous colistin sulfate to treat infections due to CR-GNB, although the clinical data is limited. The aim of our retrospective observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness and nephrotoxicity of intravenous colistin sulfate in the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Methods Fifty critically ill intensive care patients with infections due to CR-GNB were retrospectively enrolled between January 2020 and December 2021 in the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital. Favorable clinical response rate, bacterial clearance rate, nephrotoxicity, and 28-day mortality were evaluated. Results The overall favorable clinical response rate was 58%, the bacterial clearance rate was 40%, and the 28-day all-cause mortality was 44%. Temperature, neutrophil count, C-reaction protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), creatinine (Cr), and lactate levels were also significantly decreased (P<0.05). The major adverse reaction is nephrotoxicity, and renal function was evaluated on the day before and after treatment with colistin sulfate. Possible nephrotoxicity was observed in three patients (6%). Backward logistic regression was conducted to determine risk factors for the nephrotoxicity of colistin sulfate, the result showed there were no significant differences in the duration and dose of colistin sulfate. Conclusions Our results…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.