Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend amphotericin B as the preferred drug for induction therapy; however, amphotericin B is not available in certain settings. Induction therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate or voriconazole has been shown to be an effective treatment for talaromycosis. However, prospective clinical trials comparing these two antifungal drugs are absent from the literature. In this open-labeled, multicenter, prospective controlled trial, we enrolled patients at 15 hospitals in China from 2019 to 2020. Participants received induction treatment with either amphotericin B deoxycholate intravenously at a dose of 0.5 to 0.7 mg per kilogram per day or voriconazole at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for the first day, followed by 4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for 3 days, and then voriconazole was given either intravenously (4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily) or orally (200 mg twice daily) for the remaining 10 days. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during 48 weeks after baseline. Secondary outcomes were mortality at week 2 or week 24, clinical resolution of talaromycosis, and fungal clearance at week 2. A propensity score (PS) matching analysis was performed to control confounding factors. We observed no difference in the risk of death at week 2, at week 24, or at week 48 in either the unmatched cohort or the matched cohort. Both in the unmatched and the matched cohorts, logistic regression analysis revealed a significantly lower odds ratio of…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.