Evidence Hub

Association of dieting self-efficacy, weight management nutrition knowledge, physical activity, and dietary pattern among Turkish adults: a cross-sectional study

I. M. Alptekin, Emre Duman

BMC Public Health, 2025

1,457 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Unhealthy diets and obesity are major contributors to noncommunicable diseases worldwide. Dieting self-efficacy and nutrition knowledge are believed to influence eating behavior; however, their combined effect on dietary pattern is not well understood. This study aimed to examine the relationship between dieting self-efficacy, weight management-related nutrition knowledge, and dietary pattern among adults. This cross-sectional study recruited 1457 adults (aged 19–64) from Erzurum, Türkiye. Participants completed validated measures assessing dieting self-efficacy (DIET-SE), weight management nutrition knowledge (WMNKQ), and dietary intake using a brief food frequency questionnaire. A dietary pattern score was derived using principal component analysis (PCA). Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF). Partial Spearman correlations (adjusting for age and sex), multiple linear regressions, and path analysis were conducted to examine associations and mediation effects. The sample had a median age of 24 years, and 10.2% were obese. DIET-SE and WMNKQ scales showed high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.72). Nutrition knowledge was positively correlated with self-efficacy (ρ = 0.12, p < 0.01); however, both were inversely associated with dietary pattern (ρ = -0.22 and − 0.15, respectively; p < 0.01). Regression analyses confirmed that higher DIET-SE and WMNKQ scores independently predicted poorer dietary pattern…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,457 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free