Evidence Hub

Work-family balance mediates self-efficacy and subjective well-being among nurses in Chinese intensive care units: A cross-sectional study

Lating Zhang, Xian-Zhen Jin, Na Cheng, Ruhua Wang, Xinhui Liang, Haiyan Fan, Xue Jiang

Applied Nursing Research, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

ICU nurses frequently confront lengthy working hours, elevated job intensity, heavy medical responsibilities, round-the-clock shifts, and a comparatively closed working environment. The high-risk, high-intensity, high-stress nature of the profession may prompt nurses to consider resignation, culminating in a significant shortage of nursing staff, adversely affecting the health and well-being of nurses. Necessitating a comprehensive investigation into the factors influencing their subjective well-being and the interrelations among these factors, thereby establishing a theoretical foundation for a more focused intervention program aimed at enhancing the subjective well-being of nurses.

METHODS

This study employed a cross-sectional design in accordance with STROBE criteria. Two hundred forty-seven ICU nurses from four tertiary general hospitals were intentionally chosen to take an online survey. Metrics encompassed self-efficacy, work-family balance, and subjective well-being.

RESULTS

The findings demonstrated that self-efficacy strongly influenced nurses' work-family balance and subjective well-being. The work-family balance served as a mediating factor in the association between self-efficacy and subjective well-being. Mediation analysis indicated a substantial overall influence of self-efficacy on subjective well-being (β = 0.758, p < 0.01). In addition, self-efficacy had a direct effect on subjective well-being (β = 0.575, p < 0. 01), on work-family balance (β =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free