Alpelisib in pediatric PIK3CA- and TIE-2–mutant vascular anomalies: a case series on safety, efficacy, and drug exposure
Abstract
Abstract Alpelisib was recently approved by the FDA for the management of pediatric patients with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum. However, this medication was approved in the absence of pediatric pharmacokinetic data, as a fixed 50 mg dose, with no consideration of weight, the primary pharmacokinetically relevant covariate. This raises concerns regarding potential under and over-exposure. Given this gap in information, we aimed to assess the effect of alpelisib in relation to drug exposure (clinical response and drug safety). Alpelisib plasma concentrations were obtained from eight patients under treatment for vascular malformations. Drug exposure determined with area under the curve (AUC) was correlated to drug effect determined by a decrease in the size of lesions and grade of adverse events. Analysis was performed retrospectively. Eight patients received oral alpelisib through the compassionate use program of Novartis. AUC revealed substantial variability (3036 to 16620 ug*h/L) and inversely correlated to weight. Alpelisib resulted in marked clinical improvement, reducing pain, resolving coagulopathy, and improving mobility. Volumetric MRI indicated a 17.4% decrease in targeted vascular anomaly volume after 6 months of alpelisib therapy (p < 0.05), although volume decrease did not correlate with AUC. Adverse events including insulin resistance (n = 8/8) and growth restriction (n = 1/8) were documented, with severity directly correlating to drug exposure. We observed…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 8 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.