The safety and efficacy of finasteride for transgender men with androgenetic alopecia: a case series
Abstract
Testosterone replacement therapy is commonly used in transgender men for masculinization. One of the most common adverse effects of testosterone replacement therapy is androgenetic alopecia. In Japan, finasteride is approved exclusively for cisgender men and is not indicated for transgender men. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride in transgender men with androgenetic alopecia. This study included three transgender men (assigned female at birth, identifying as male), aged 44, 43, and 29 years. All participants were of Asian ethnicity. A clinical trial was conducted from October 2021 to December 2023. Transgender men aged 20–60 years who had not undergone hysterectomy, were undergoing testosterone replacement therapy, and who had been diagnosed with stage ≥ II androgenetic alopecia on the basis of the Norwood–Hamilton scale were recruited. The participants initiated treatment with 0.2 mg of finasteride per day for 3 months (phase 1). If no adverse events above grade 2 occurred, the dose was increased to 1.0 mg per day for an additional 3 months (phase 2). The primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-related adverse events at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, as well as the rate of participants continuing treatment at 3 months. None of the patients experienced serious adverse events at 3 months, and all the patients extended their treatment to a total of 6 months. Improvements of at least one stage on the N–H scale were…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
- Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
- Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cleaning efficacy of EDDY versus ultrasonically-activated irrigation in root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts and essential oils of Cinnamomum, Salvia, and Mentha spp. against foodborne pathogens: A meta-analysis study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.