Evidence Hub

Long-term atrial arrhythmia characterization and treatment efficacy evaluation using non-invasive echocardiography-based electromechanical cycle length mapping: a case series

Melina Tourni, Rachel Weber, Angelo B. Biviano, Elisa E. Konofagou

European Heart Journal: Case Reports, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac condition characterized by irregular heart rhythm. Conventional non-invasive diagnostic techniques, while useful, have limitations in providing comprehensive information for treatment planning. To address this gap, electromechanical cycle length mapping (ECLM), a non-invasive echocardiography-based technique, has emerged as a promising approach. Electromechanical cycle length mapping offers quantitative and spatially specific insights into atrial electromechanical activation rate mapping, thereby enhancing our understanding of arrhythmia disease progression in AF patients. Case summary In this case series, we present two patient cases demonstrating the potential utility of ECLM in monitoring and evaluating treatment responses in atrial arrhythmia. The 1st case involved a 61-year-old male with persistent AF who underwent multiple procedures, including direct current cardioversion (DCCV) and radiofrequency ablation. Over three different DCCV encounters, pre- and post-procedure ECLM scans were performed, and the results showed the localization and incomplete elimination of arrhythmic triggers post-DCCV, which were used as early indicators of AF recurrence. The 2nd case involved a 71-year-old male with paroxysmal AF who also underwent cardioversion and ablation procedures. Electromechanical cycle length mapping imaging demonstrated a progressive reduction and elimination of arrhythmia triggers after each…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free