Evidence Hub

Management of immune-related myocarditis, myositis and myasthenia gravis (MMM) overlap syndrome: a single institution case series and literature review

A. Sánchez-Camacho, Alberto Torres-Zurita, Laura Gallego-López, Rocío Hernández-Pacheco, S. Silva-Romeiro, M. C. Álamo de la Gala, Enrique Peral-Gutiérrez de Ceballos, L. de la Cruz-Merino

Frontiers in Immunology, 2025

40 citations

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of various malignancies, particularly melanoma. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose significant challenges, particularly in cases of severe toxicity syndromes. One such life-threatening irAE is the myocarditis, myositis, and myasthenia gravis (MMM) overlap syndrome, which occurs in less than 1% of patients but has in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 40 to 60%. Due to its rarity and complexity, early recognition and a multidisciplinary approach are critical to improving outcomes. Methods We present a single-institution case series of four patients diagnosed with MMM overlap syndrome following ICI therapy. Clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging, and electrophysiological tests were analyzed to confirm the diagnosis. Therapeutic interventions-including corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange (PLEX), tocilizumab, and rituximab- were evaluated in terms of efficacy and clinical outcomes. Results The onset of MMM syndrome varied from 2 to 4 weeks after initiating ICI therapy. Patients presented with rapidly progressive symptoms, including ptosis, bulbar dysfunction, respiratory distress, myopathy, and cardiac conduction abnormalities. Immunosuppressive therapy with high-dose corticosteroids was initiated in all cases. Additional immunomodulatory treatments (IVIG, tocilizumab, PLEX, and rituximab) were administered based on clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free