Evidence Hub

Treatment of Refractory Ischemic Priapism: A Case Report and Literature Review

Vazquez Gonzalez JR, Cortez Betancourt R, Alvarez Lopez JG, Cortez Ramirez D, Garcia Rivera OU

Cureus, 2023

1 citation

Abstract

Recurrent priapism is a rare and poorly known entity. It is defined by recurrent episodes of painful erections that last less than four hours. The etiology is similar to that of ischemic priapism. Episodes lasting more than four hours require immediate intervention to prevent penile fibrosis and subsequent erectile dysfunction. A 42-year-old male with no significant chronic-degenerative history was referred to our medical center from his second-level medical unit after a 56-hour history of ischemic priapism with the persistence of tumescence despite medical and surgical treatment. Upon interrogation, the patient reported stuttering (recurrent) episodes of painful erections lasting approximately three to four hours, not associated with sexual activity or arousal, in the past two years, with spontaneous resolution. He denied the use of psychotropics or drugs for erectile dysfunction. As a palliative measure, a left saphenous-cavernous (Grayhack) bypass was performed, with a 90% decrease in tumescence and total resolution of pain during the first 12 hours. There is little information and treatment recommendations for patients with recurrent priapism, and even less for patients who are refractory to conventional medical and surgical treatment. Recurrent or stuttering priapism is a condition with a low incidence and a pathophysiology compatible with low-flow priapism. It is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis in terms of erectile function. Likewise, it is mostly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free