Evidence Hub

Congenital Isolated Unilateral Agenesis of Pulmonary Arteries with 3-Year Follow-Up after Initiation of Treatment

Nakata M, Yokota N, Uehara H, Tabata K, Kenzaka T

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023

1 citation

Abstract

Background and objective: Unilateral agenesis of pulmonary arteries (UAPA) is a rare disease, with approximately 400 cases reported to date. UAPA is often associated with congenital heart disease, and the uncomplicated form is isolated UAPA, which accounts for approximately 30% of all cases of UAPA. The incidence of pulmonary hypertension due to UAPA has been reported to range from 19 to 44%. There is no consensus treatment for pulmonary hypertension associated with UAPA. We present the first reported case in which a three-drug combination, comprising of iloprost inhalation, riociguat, and ambrisentan, was administered to a patient with UAPA, and was followed-up for 3 years post-diagnosis. Case presentation: A 68-year-old Japanese woman presented to our hospital with dyspnea and chest discomfort. She underwent chest radiography, blood tests, and echocardiography; however, the cause of the patient's symptoms could not be identified. During regular follow-up, an echocardiography 21 months after the initial visit revealed elevated right ventricular pressure (peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity: 5.2 m/s and right ventricular systolic pressure: 120 mmHg) and a diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension was made. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest and a pulmonary blood flow scintigram were performed to investigate the cause of pulmonary hypertension, and isolated UAPA was diagnosed. The patient was treated with a three-drug combination of iloprost inhalation,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free