Evidence Hub

The Efficacy of Atlantoaxial Facet Joint Distraction and Fixation and Foramen Magnum Decompression for Chiari Type 1 Malformation with Basilar Invagination: A Case Report

Kotaro Kohara, Tatsuya Maegawa, Eitaro Okumura, Ryo Hashimoto, Motoo Kubota

NMC Case Report Journal, 2025

Abstract

Foramen magnum decompression is an established surgical method for the treatment of Chiari type 1 malformation with syringomyelia. However, in some cases, neurologic symptoms that improve only after foramen magnum decompression may deteriorate again, and it has been suspected that increased instability of the craniocervical junction may be a factor. We report a case of Chiari type 1 malformation accompanied by basilar invagination and syringomyelia in which atlantoaxial facet joint distraction and fixation was performed as a revision surgery for deteriorating neurologic symptoms after foramen magnum decompression. The patient was a 16-year-old boy with chief complaints of gait disturbance and repeated falls. He was diagnosed with Chiari type 1 malformation accompanied by basilar invagination and syringomyelia. The clivo-axial angle was narrow at 105.8°. Initially, only foramen magnum decompression was performed, and the symptoms were relieved after the procedure but re-exacerbated within 2 weeks. The condition was speculated to have worsened instability at the atlantoaxial segment and ventral medullary compression; then, atlantoaxial facet joint distraction and fixation was performed secondarily, and symptoms improved. There is no clear surgical standard for performing foramen magnum decompression, atlantoaxial facet joint distraction and fixation, or a combination of both for Chiari type 1 malformation. Foramen magnum decompression provides horizontal decompression at the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free