Evidence Hub

Efficacy of prescribing Inderal for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a young patient with the normal QT interval: A case report study

Mohsen Shafiee, Zeinab Nassari, Fatereh Baharlouei-Yancheshmeh, N. Tahery, Abdolvahab Baradaran, Raha Tabahfar, Elham Mohamadidarveshvan, Javad Shaabanzadeh et al.

SAGE Open Medical Case Reports, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) is a group of life-threatening heart rhythm disorders. These arrhythmias share similar electrocardiographic characteristics but require different modes of therapy for effective treatment. It is important to note that the medications that are considered the first-line treatment for one type of PVT may not be appropriate for another type, and may worsen the condition. Therefore, it is crucial to accurately diagnose the type of PVT before initiating treatment to provide the most effective therapy for the patient. A 42-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with dyspnea, Levine sign, and severe chest pain. His electrocardiogram showed ST elevation, and the QT interval was normal. The patient was sent to the cath lab based on the treatment protocols. According to the results of angiography, three coronary arteries were severely obstructed. His coronary arteries did not open during percutaneous coronary intervention; thus, the healthcare team decided on open heart surgery. He suffered from recurrent PVT following open heart surgery and did not respond to any of the drugs suitable for this type of tachycardia. Inderal prevented the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in a patient with polymorphic VT without QT prolongation, contrary to the healthcare team’s expectations. Inderal was used as the last line of treatment because this patient’s arrhythmia was polymorphic VT without QT prolongation. Inderal is typically used…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free