Evidence Hub

Efficacy of oral ferric citrate hydrate treatment for anemia caused by niraparib: a case report

Hiroshi Kobayashi, Yuki Yamada

Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2022

4 citations

Abstract

Background Maintenance therapy using poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose)polymerase inhibitors may have adverse events, including hematological toxicity, and may limit therapeutic potential in patients with cancer. Niraparib-induced anemia negatively impacts one’s quality of life. Its amelioration by ferrous iron (for example, sodium ferrous citrate), folic acid, or vitamin B12 has not been supported. Oral ferric citrate hydrate increases circulating levels of iron and hepatic iron accumulation, improving renal anemia in patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. The uptake of ferric iron is considered to be much higher than that of ferrous iron. Case presentation The admitted patient was a 57-year-old Japanese woman with stage IIIB ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery and standard carboplatin–paclitaxel chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab, followed by niraparib (200 mg/day) maintenance therapy. The patient started oral SFC (100 mg/day) to treat niraparib-related anemia. However, she required two units of packed red blood cell transfusions three times within 3 months after starting niraparib treatment. The patient was diagnosed with niraparib-related anemia. The blood test results after 1 month from the start of niraparib treatment were as follows: red blood cells, 211 × 10 4 /μL; hemoglobin, 7.0 g/dL; hematocrit, 20.8%; reticulocyte, 0.2%; platelet count, 18.0 × 10 4 /μL. She was switched to oral ferric citrate hydrate with a dose of 500 mg per…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free