Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Sotatercept in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review

Leila Ghanbari Afra, Asma Mousavi, Mohammad Mirzaei, Yasaman Rahimi, Fatemeh Khosravi, Mohammad Rahmanian

International Cardivascular Research Journal, 2024

323 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Context: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by the narrowing and remodeling of small pulmonary arteries, resulting from an imbalance in signaling pathways that regulate cell proliferation. Current therapeutic strategies for PAH target specific pathways to enhance pulmonary hemodynamics, including soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, endothelin receptor antagonists, and prostacyclin pathway modulators. Sotatercept emerges as a promising therapeutic option that targets the underlying mechanism of PAH by improving the integrity of the endothelial layer of pulmonary arteries, promoting cellular proliferation, and alleviating vascular dysfunction. Objectives: This study systematically aims to review existing literature on the efficacy and safety of sotatercept in treating PAH. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across five online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar) to identify relevant studies. Original studies with human participants that investigated the efficacy and safety of sotatercept in patients with PAH were included. The primary outcomes assessed included clinical parameters such as pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and improvements in World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC) over follow-up periods of up to 24 weeks. Additionally, adverse events…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 323 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free