Evidence Hub

Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening

Sami T. Kurkinen, Jukka V. Lehtonen, Olli T. Pentikäinen, Pekka A. Postila

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2022

4 citations

Abstract

Molecular docking is a key in silico method used routinely in modern drug discovery projects. Although docking provides high-quality ligand binding predictions, it regularly fails to separate the active compounds from the inactive ones. In negative image-based rescoring (R-NiB), the shape/electrostatic potential (ESP) of docking poses is compared to the negative image of the protein's ligand binding cavity. While R-NiB often improves the docking yield considerably, the cavity-based models do not reach their full potential without expert editing. Accordingly, a greedy search-driven methodology, brute force negative image-based optimization (BR-NiB), is presented for optimizing the models via iterative editing and benchmarking. Thorough and unbiased training, testing and stringent validation with a multitude of drug targets, and alternative docking software show that BR-NiB ensures excellent docking efficacy. BR-NiB can be considered as a new type of shape-focused pharmacophore modeling, where the optimized models contain only the most vital cavity information needed for effectively filtering docked actives from the inactive or decoy compounds. Finally, the BR-NiB code for performing the automated optimization is provided free-of-charge under MIT license via GitHub (https://github.com/jvlehtonen/brutenib) for boosting the success rates of docking-based virtual screening campaigns.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free