Can pregnancy be a placebo effect?: Terminology, designs, and conclusions in the study of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments of behavior disorders
Abstract
This paper discusses several salient issues in the clinical research enterprise which were stimulated by chapters on research methods and placebo phenomena in White, Tursky and Schwartz (1985), Placebo: Theory, Research, and Mechanisms. These issues include the commonalities of questions, domains and classes of variables, and research strategies needed for the discovery, accumulation and application of knowledge regarding effective clinical treatments. Problems of unwarranted uniformity assumptions and absolute design requirements as well as the failure to attend to the conceptual relevance, strength and integrity of procedures are noted with examples from the systematic desensitization literature. Meta-analyses and indexes of effect size are also examined with examples demonstrating the need for especially cautious interpretation of these procedures. A re-emphasis of the construct validity approach with better designed and executed individual studies is endorsed as the best means to improve progress.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.