Evidence Hub

Enhancing Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy at Discharge Through Collaborative Care: Evidence from the TIME-HF Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Jeemon P, Thottathan A, Alex M, Ismail S, Mohan R, Karkuzhiyil S, Charantharalyil Gopalan B, Javaregowda Devaraju C et al.

2026

755 participants

Abstract

Background Nurse-led care supported by mobile health (mHealth) technologies offers a feasible strategy to strengthen heart failure (HF) management in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated the impact of an mHealth-enabled, nurse-led collaborative care model on prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) at discharge among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in India. Methods The TIME-HF study was a multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted across 22 centers enrolling patients with HFrEF. Centers were randomized 1:1 to an intervention arm (11 centers; 755 patients) or enhanced usual care (11 centers; 752 patients). In the intervention arm, nurses used an mHealth application to review GDMT prescriptions and recommend treatment modifications to physicians. GDMT at discharge was assessed individually and using a composite score. Intervention effects were evaluated using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results Participants were predominantly male (77.6%) with a mean age of 61.9 years (SD 12.1). Hypertension (56.1%), diabetes (62%), and chronic kidney disease (18.4%) were common comorbidities. Ischemic heart disease was the leading etiology (77.4%), and 48.8% were in NYHA class III/IV. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At discharge, 20% received all four GDMT components, with higher use in the intervention group than usual care (27% vs 13%, p < 0.001;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 755 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free