Evidence Hub

Endogenous Incretin Secretagogue Compositions as a Mechanistic Class Versus Pharmacological Incretin Receptor Agonists for Weight Reduction in Overweight Adults: A Real-World Observational Cohort Analysis of a Nutraceutical Composition (Trimsulin) and Comparison with Published Outcomes for Semaglutide and Tirzepatide

Kaufman RC

2026

18,386 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background: Pharmacological glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) such as semaglutide and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 receptor agonists such as tirzepatide produce clinically meaningful weight reduction in adults with overweight or obesity. However, gastrointestinal and serious adverse events affect a substantial proportion of treated patients, contributing to discontinuation and limiting long-term adherence. Nutraceutical compositions designed to stimulate endogenous GLP-1 and GIP secretion may offer a tolerability advantage. Objective: To describe weight change and adverse event rates in a real-world cohort of overweight adults using a nutraceutical endogenous incretin secretagogue composition (Trimsulin Weight Loss Program) and to compare these outcomes with publicly available outcome data for semaglutide and tirzepatide. Methods: Observational cohort analysis of 503 overweight adults enrolled in the Trimsulin Weight Loss Program, comprising two nutraceutical products (Control, a powdered drink mix; Thermo, a capsule formulation) taken twice daily before meals, plus a structured dietary protocol and a moderate-exercise recommendation. Body weight, BMI, and participant-reported adverse events were tracked at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Comparative weight-loss outcomes for semaglutide and tirzepatide were drawn from the on-treatment estimand of the published Truveta-derived real-world cohort analysis by Rodriguez et al.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 18,386 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free