Evidence Hub

Identification of collagen features predictive of recurrence following radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: a retrospective case control analysis

Jenkins RP, Fu X, Waise S, Dewan M, Griffin C, Stuttle C, Cruickshank C, Dearnaley D et al.

2026

422 participants

Abstract

Background: Changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) are a recognised feature of aggressive prostate cancer, but they are not exploited in clinical decision-making. We aimed to develop automated quantitative ECM parameters to facilitate risk stratification for localised prostate cancer.

Methods: 378 quantitative ECM parameters were derived from picrosirius red-stained diagnostic prostate biopsies in a cohort of 422 patients, matched 1:1 for recurrence, recruited to the CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer) trial of radiotherapy fractionation for localised prostate cancer. These ECM parameters comprehensively described fibre architecture, gaps and ECM texture. Machine learning models at the level of both individual image tiles and patients defined how ECM parameters related to tumour versus normal prostate, Gleason grade group and recurrence. Shapley analysis was used to interpret ECM feature importance and develop signatures associated with recurrence.

Results: Specific ECM patterns identified tumour versus normal prostate, Gleason pattern 4 versus 3 and recurrence. ECM patterns associated with recurrence were enriched in Gleason 4+3 patients, versus Gleason 3+4 patients. Shapley analysis revealed that biopsies from patients with recurrence had smaller more elongated gaps between fibres, with finer grained ECM texture and lower ECM homogeneity than less recurrent regions.

Interpretation: Quantitative automated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 422 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free