T-Cell Engagers Targeting BCMA, GPRC5D, or FcRH5 in Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Landscape Beyond CAR-T Cell Therapy, a Systematic Review and Network Meta Analysis
Abstract
Background: : Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma is marked by frequent triple-class refractoriness and poor survival, whereas bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA, GPRC5D, or FcRH5 show meaningful activity even in heavily pretreated and post-BCMA disease.This meta-analysis evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of these agents in RRMM using direct and indirect evidence.
Methods:: We manually searched 7 databases and identified 44 studies for quantitative analysis. Forest plots were created using R 4.1.x software.
Results:: Versus SOC, odds of ORR were higher with Talquetamab, Teclistamab, Elranatamab, and Linvoseltamab (5.73, 4.86, 3.84, 2.63). PFS improved with Teclistamab (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.36–0.55), Talquetamab (0.50, 0.36–0.55), Elranatamab (0.45, 0.36–0.55), and Linvoseltamab (0.23, 0.17–0.31). Linoseltamab and Elranatamab showed numerically longer OS relative to SOC ( HR 0.41, 0.24–0.70) and (HR 0.58, 0.43–0.78), but numerically shorter OS with Teclistamab (HR 1.82, 1.37–2.42) and Talquetamab (HR 1.75, 1.20–2.57). In pooled single‑arm data, Talquetamab had the highest ORR (72%) and CRS (68%); Teclistamab showed ORR of 61% with CRS 61% and Linvoseltamab showed ORR of 60% with CRS 51%. Cevostamab and Elranatamab had ORR 49% and 56% with CRS 61% and 52%, respectively.
Conclusion:: In RRMM, all bispecific antibodies showed superior ORR along with improved PFS as compared to SOC. Linoseltamab and Elranatamab showed numerically longer OS relative to SOC, whereas…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.