A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of BSI-045B mAb Injection in Healthy Adult Subjects and Patients With Atopic Dermatitis
Abstract
This randomized, double-blind, single center, placebo-controlled, phase 1 single ascending dose (SAD)/multiple ascending dose (MAD) study is designed to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, activity, immunogenicity, and PD of BSI-045B. Approximately 68 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects in this study include 56 healthy volunteers (HVs) and 12 patients with AD.
This study is divided into 3 parts:
1. Part A: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, immunogenicity, and PD of single ascending doses of BSI-045B administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection of 120, 240, 480, and 720 mg to HVs
2. Part B: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, activity (as measured by the Eczema Area and Severity Index \[EASI\] score), immunogenicity, and PD of a single dose of BSI-045B administered as a SC injection of 480 mg to patients with AD
3. Part C: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, immunogenicity, and PD of multiple ascending doses of BSI-045B administered as five (5) SC injections of 240, 480, and 600 mg every 7 days (Q7D) to HVs
Conditions: Atopic Dermatitis.
Primary outcome: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); Laboratory Tests; Vital signs; ECG.
Enrollment: 54 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 54 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.