Online or Face-to-face Treatment for Insomnia? A Wait-list Controlled Trial
Abstract
The object of this study is to compare internet-delivered treatment for insomnia to face-to-face treatment and a waiting-list. In this study participants are randomized to: 1) online cognitive-behavioral intervention; 2) face-to-face cognitive behavioral intervention; 3) waiting-list. Both the online and face-to-face interventions consist of: diary; psycho-education; relaxation exercises; stimulus control/sleep hygiene; sleep restriction; challenging the misconceptions about sleep; and paradoxical exercise. Adult persons with insomnia will be invited via a popular scientific website to fill out online questionnaires. Participants fill out questionnaires and a dairy at baseline post-test, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Participants on the waiting-list receive online treatment after the first post-test. The investigators expect that the online-delivered treatment and the face-to-face treatment are equally effective.
Conditions: Insomnia.
Primary outcome: Sleep continuity (consisting of sleep latency, time awake after sleep onset, total sleep time); Insomnia Severity Index.
Enrollment: 90 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 90 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.