Comparative Evaluation of rhPDGF- BB With Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel and CTG Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With CTG Alone for Root Coverage in Multiple Mandibular Gingival Recession Defects- A RCT
Abstract
The present study is a human, prospective, single centre, single blind, comparative controlled randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Miller's Class I, II or combination of class I and II mandibular recession and comparing the clinical outcomes prior to and 6 months after treatment. The trial is in accordance to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.
Conditions: Gingival Recession.
Primary outcome: Gingival recession depth (GRD); 2. Gingival Recession Width (GRW); Mean root coverage(MRC); Complete root coverage(CRC); coverage esthetic score(RCES).
Enrollment: 6 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.