A 24-week Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Multi-center Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral QTI571 as an add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Imatinib in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, a Randomized, Efficacy Study (IMPRES)
Abstract
A multinational, multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of imatinib as an add-on therapy in the treatment of patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
Conditions: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Primary outcome: Difference in Six-minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) Between Imatinib and Placebo at 24 Weeks.
Enrollment: 202 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 202 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.