An Integrated and Coherent Framework for Point Estimation and Hypothesis Testing with Concurrent Controls in Platform Trials
Abstract
A platform trial with a master protocol provides an infrastructure to ethically and efficiently evaluate multiple treatment options in multiple diseases. Given that certain study drugs can enter or exit a platform trial, the randomization ratio is possible to change over time, and this potential modification is not necessarily dependent on accumulating outcomes data. It is recommended that the analysis should account for time periods with different randomization ratios, with possible approaches such as Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) or a weighted approach by the time period. To guide practical implementation, we specifically investigate the relationship between these two estimators, and further derive an optimal estimator within this class to gain efficacy. Practical guidance is provided on how to construct estimators based on observed data to approximate this unknown weight. The connection between the proposed method and the weighted least squares is also studied. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate that the proposed method can control type I error rate with a reduced estimation bias, and can also achieve satisfactory power and mean squared error (MSE) with computational efficiency. Another appealing feature of our framework is the ability to provide consistent conclusions for both point estimation and hypothesis testing. This is critical to the interpretation of clinical trial results. The proposed method is further applied to the Accelerating…
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.