Investigating Primary Care Indications to Improve Electronic Health Record in Dementia Target Trial Emulation
Abstract
Missing data, inaccuracies in medication lists, and recording delays in electronic health records (EHR) are major limitations for target trial emulation (TTE), the process by which EHR data are used to retrospectively emulate a randomized control trial. EHR TTE relies on recorded data that proxy true drug exposures and outcomes. We investigate the under-utilized criterion that a patient has indications of primary care provider (PCP) encounters within the EHR. Such patients tend to have more records overall and a greater proportion of the types of encounters that materialize comprehensive and up-to-date records. We examine the impact of including a PCP feature in the TTE model or as an eligibility criterion for cohort selection, contrasted with ignoring it altogether. To that end, we compare the estimated effects of two first line antidiabetic drug classes on the onset of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). We find that the estimated treatment effect is sensitive to the consideration of a PCP feature, particularly when used as an eligibility criterion. Our work suggests that this PCP feature should be further researched.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.