An IPCW Adjusted Win Statistics Approach in Clinical Trials Incorporating Equivalence Margins to Define Ties
Abstract
In clinical trials, multiple outcomes of different priorities commonly occur as the patient's response may not be adequately characterized by a single outcome. Win statistics are appealing summary measures for between-group difference at more than one endpoint. When defining the result of pairwise comparisons of a time-to-event endpoint, it is desirable to allow ties to account for incomplete follow-up and not clinically meaningful difference in endpoints of interest. In this paper, we propose a class of win statistics for time-to-event endpoints with a user-specified equivalence margin. These win statistics are identifiable in the presence of right-censoring and do not depend on the censoring distribution. We then develop estimation and inference procedures for the proposed win statistics based on inverse-probability-of-censoring {weighting} (IPCW) adjustment to handle right-censoring. We conduct extensive simulations to investigate the operational characteristics of the proposed procedure in the finite sample setting. A real oncology trial is used to illustrate the proposed approach.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.