A nomogram to estimate the proportion of patients at hemoglobin A1c target <7% with noninsulin antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of 137 randomized controlled trials with 39,845 patients
Abstract
We assessed the efficacy of noninsulin antidiabetic medications used in current clinical practice (metformin, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, glinides, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists) to reach the HbA1c target <7% in people with type 2 diabetes. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception through April 2011 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving noninsulin antidiabetic drugs. RCTs had to report the effect of any diabetes medication on the HbA1c levels, to include at least 30 subjects in every arm of the study, and to last at least 12 weeks. Data were summarized across studies using random-effects meta-regression. We found 137 RCTs with 205 arms and 39,845 patients. The proportion of patients who achieved the HbA1c goal ranged from 25.9% (95% CI 18.5-34.9) with α-glucosidase inhibitors to 48.6% (95% CI, 53.6) with GLP-1 analogs. Baseline HbA1c was the major determinant of the proportion of patients at HbA1c goal. The meta-regression model with mean baseline HbA1c value, concomitant drug use, and class of drugs as covariates explained almost 67% of the between-study variability. A nomogram was developed to estimate the proportion of patients at target for each noninsulin drug class: for a baseline HbA1c level of 7.5%, all noninsulin drugs, except α-glucosidase inhibitors, achieved the HbA1c goal <7% in more than 50% of patients. Starting or intensifying pharmacological…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 39,845 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Adverse effects of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors on renal and arrhythmia events: meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants
- Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
- Exposure to WHO AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.