Evidence Hub

Characterization of the Safety Profile of the Triple Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitor Dasotraline Based on Clinical Trial Data and Disproportionality Analyses of Four Related Pharmacological Classes Using Real-World Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Gumenyuk S, Ogirala A, Szabo ST, Koblan K, Hopkins SC, Ufer M

Clinical drug investigation, 2026

Abstract

Background and objectives: The safety profile of single or dual monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MRIs) is based on longstanding post-marketing experience but remains to be established for triple MRIs that may exhibit favorable efficacy as treatment of psychiatric disorders. Here, we characterized the safety profile of the triple MRI dasotraline based on disproportionality analyses and clinical trial data.

Methods: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System was queried for adverse events of commonly prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs), and norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRIs). Bayesian disproportionality analyses were conducted to determine the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) for each Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) preferred term (PT) within each drug class. Five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 studies with dasotraline were utilized to determine the pooled incidence of disproportionally reported PTs (EBGM ≥3) on dasotraline and placebo.

Results: A total of 1087, 940, 409, and 714 PTs with an EBGM ≥3 were identified for SSRIs, SNRIs, NRIs, and NDRIs, respectively. The cumulative pooled incidence of these class-related PTs was approximately 2- to 2.5-fold higher for dasotraline than placebo (SSRIs: 24.7%/9.6%; SNRIs: 50.7%/26.3%; NRIs: 56.5%/32.2%; NDRIs: 35.2%/18.2%).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free