Evidence Hub

Tuberculosis-Related Outcomes in Dermatologic Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu K, Zeng Z, Lu W, Yang Y, Lin T

JAMA dermatology, 2026

15 participants

Abstract

Importance: Biologic agents are commonly used with conventional immunosuppressants for treatment of immune-mediated dermatologic diseases, raising concerns about tuberculosis (TB) risk, particularly in high-burden geographic regions. Previous studies have shown inconsistent results across biologic classes, with most focusing on active TB and limited data on latent TB infection (LTBI) conversion.

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of active TB and LTBI conversion in dermatologic patients receiving systemic therapy and to explore differences by biologic class and regional TB burden.

Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to October 1, 2025. Controlled vocabulary and free-text terms were used for dermatologic diseases, systemic therapies, and tuberculosis-related outcomes. Clinical trial registries and reference lists were also screened.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies reporting active TB or LTBI conversion in dermatologic patients receiving systemic therapy were included. Two reviewers independently screened records and performed full-text assessment.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool) were conducted independently by 2 reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Single-arm incidence rates were pooled using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free